Svatman

What do you Think about life? What’s the definition of life according to you?

Great question by the way! So my idea about life is that it’s a period of just some years say 70-80 where we tour the earth when we compare that the earth is around 14 billion years old. We think during this small period that we must be famous for so called social recognition during the time when we’re alive but mostly for the time after death say 100-500 or at most 10,000 years, probably never more than that.
Just for this social recognition, we made social rules and hierarchy which soon became limiting factors rather than helping us in our growth and letting us be what we truly want to be.
During this time where we could have made some life changing/easing things, unfortunately we’re stuck at fighting with orthodox/patriarchal/sensor societies, who are hell bent to make the society unprogressive.
Now the question is what defines progressiveness? Progressiveness ,according to me, is a situation in which most people either already have or trying to have mental peace, a state of mind where some basic things are predictable, and certainly not limiting our freedom, and where we’re not being rude with anyone. We’re being what we want to be, e.g, if we want to roam naked on the road, we’re doing, no one should have an issue. People have already watched lots of porn, or similar type of movies. I don’t think walking naked on the road should be an issue. The dresses should be just like ornaments or make-up solutions, which we could put on at our will, not that it should be forced on us to wear particular dresses in particular settings. We should wear just at our will, or to please our partner or potential partners or any people for that matter.
Progressiveness could also mean we’re free to question anything without feeling of any percussion from any group of individuals or established system, where we’re not bound by rules of social orders. We could and should be asked by any particular individual on our thoughts but it should not be from the system one follows (political party, religious institutions, country/nation-state).
So unfortunately, in my view, life is still extremely limited. And it will continue to be until all people are mentally healthy and emotionally secure, afterall people are driven by emotions, the more better and secure our emotions are, the more healthier and prosperous we’ll be.

But then I think, does progressiveness in life mean only harmony? Or if harmony is increased then technical evolution will even stop, because as we can see the most rapid technical evolution happens in the Army, and it’s the development in the army which had  provided us with the internet.

And army is meant for either providing us defence or attack on others, and certainly not a place where we’re allowed to openly express or discuss our ideas and views which we’re primarily driven to do.

So ideal progressiveness leads to destruction if there remains any place where this thought is not followed?

And what type of relationship exists between moral and technical progressiveness?